TABLE 36


Installation No. of units Project status
NAS Corpus Christi, TX 404 Construction complete.
NAVSTA Everett, WA 185 Construction complete.
Fort Carson, CO 2,600 Project in procurement.
Lackland AFB, TX 285 Project in procurement.
Camp Pendleton MCB, CA 716 RFP ready for issue.
Albany MCLB, GA 155 RFP issued.
Robins, AFB GA 760 RFP under development.
Fort Hood, TX 5,825 RFP under development.
Elmendorf AFB, AK 828 RFP under development.
Fort Stweart, GA 3,282 RFP under development.
Fort Lewis, WA 3,956 RFP under development.
Fort Meade, MD 3,125 RFP under development.
Fort Irwin 2,028 RFP under development.
Total 24,149




















TABLE 37


Office Overhead (Rent, utilities, etc.) $30
Travel 9
Consultant Support 6,25
Contract administration 36




















TABLE 38


Policy Development/Support $25
Energy Savings
Performance Contracting (to Army Corps of Engineers, Hunstville in support of all DOD installations) 4,00
Technical Assistance (i.e. Civil Engineering Research Laboratory) 2,86
Energy efficient equipment purchases (i.e. Direct Digital Controls 4,00
Support Tri-Service Working Group to develop energy efficient policy/criteria manual 42
Execution of Specific Service Energy Projects 3,46
No DOD-wide FEMP funds were requested for Fiscal Year 1999.


















TABLE 39


Fiscal year 1998 appropriated Fiscal year 1999 request Change
Army $125,000,000 Transferred from Defensewide
$706,477,000 665,876,000 6% decrease
Navy 678,066,000 468,150,000 31% decrease
Air Force 694,255,000 454,810,000 34% decrease




















TABLE 40


Million
Fiscal year 95:
Fort Carson $15.8
Fiscal year 98:
Fort Hood 18.8
Fiscal year 98:
Fort Meade 7.9
Fiscal year 98:
Fort Bragg 16.8
Fiscal year 98:
Fort Campbell 6.0
Total 65.3


















TABLE 41


FYDP Project Programmed
amount
Scope
2000 Whole Barracks Renewal/82d-1st Brigade, Phase II $59,000,000 320
2001 Whole Barracks Renewal/82d-1st Brigade, Phase III & Upgrade Barracks for Corps Artillery 50,000,000 536
2002 Whole Barracks Renewal/82d Combat Aviation Brigade, Phase I 56,000,000 336
2003 Whole Barracks Renewal/82d Combat Aviation Brigade, Phase II & Upgrade Barracks for U.S. Army Special Operations Command Unit 58,000,000 768


















TABLE 42


Fiscal year Cost ($ million) Scope (kilometers)
1996-Ph 1256
1997-Ph 2256
1998-Ph 3245
1999-Ph 4253
2000-Ph 5250
2001-Ph 6248
2002-Ph 7253
2003-Ph 8255
2004-Ph 9231
2005-Ph 10235


















TABLE 43


UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY
Fiscal year Requested
($ millions)
Appropriated
($ millions)
1989 16.200 16.200
1990 11.000 11.000
1991 7.603 8.603
1992 11.000 11.000
1993 3.800 5.500
1994 12.000 12.000
1995 12.000 12.000
1996 9.000 9.000
1997 5.000 5.000
1998 6.000 7.400


















TABLE 44


[In thousands of dollars]
Criteria preparation Design surveillance Construction surveillance Okinawa relocation Total
Japan 6,600 3,700 4,700 15,000
Korea 185 260 555 1,000
Okinawa 2,000 2,000
Italy 50 28 78
Germany 92 2,280 2,372
Total 6,927 3,960 7,563 2,000 20,450


















TABLE 45


FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99
Government Owned—U.S. 95,552 93,066 90,406 88,567
Government Owned—Foreign 27,834 29,303 28,764 28,205
Leased—U.S. 4,192 4,200 4,151 4,200
Leased—Foreign 10,460 10,793 11,168 10,497
Privatized (CVI) 1,824 1,824


















TABLE 46


Fiscal year Location Project Unobligated balance ($M) Obligation plan
1994 Anniston, Alabama Facility 13.0 4QFY98
1995 Anniston, Alabama Facility 4.6 2QFY99
1997 Pine Bluff, Arkansas Facility 10.9 2QFY99
1998 Anniston, Alabama Facility 8.9 4QFY99
Umatilla, Oregon Facility 2.5 2QFY99
Pine Bluff, Arkansas Depot Support 10.0 3QFY98

Note: The unobligated balances provided above are as of February 28, 1998 and include funding held in reserve by the Corps of Engineers for items such as future contract awards, supervision and administrative costs, engineering during construction, claim adjustments, management reserve, and contingency.



















TABLE 47


(Dollars in millions)
Site:
Anniston, Alabama 159.9
Umatilla, Oregon 184.4
Pine Bluff, Arkansas 65.5


















TABLE 48


[Current year dollars in millions/Fiscal Year]
Project FY97 and prior FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Total
PM-Chem Demil Training Facility 16.1 16.1
Tooele, UT Facility 198.0 198.0
Anniston, AL Facility 150.0 9.9 7.0 166.9
Depot Support 14.3 14.3
Umatilla, OR Facility 76.0 57.43 51.0 9.0 193.43
Depot Support 11.2 11.2
Pine Bluff AR Facility 49.0 16.5 72.0 17.0 154.5
Depot Support 10.0 10.0
Pueblo, CO* Facility 12.0 52.0 96.5 34.0 194.5
Depot Support 6.3 6.3
Blue Grass, KY Facility 12.0 52.0 92.0 30.8 186.8
Depot Support 11.2 11.2
Aberdeen, MD Facility 26.5 58.5 85.0 14.5 184.5
Depot Support 1.85 1.85
Newport, IN Facility 27.5 60.75 87.5 13.8 189.55
Depot Support 2.0 2.0
Planning & Design 105.3 9.2 114.5
Total 626.2 86.53 125.35 242.45 293.5 216.8 64.8 1,665.63

*Funding requirement may change pending assessment of Assembled Chemical Weapon Assessment Program in consonance with Public Law 104-208.

















TABLE 49


Location Start of construction Start of systemization Operations
Johnston Atoll* 3QFY90-4QFY00
Tooele, UT 4QFY96-4QFY03
Anniston, AL 3QFY97 2QFY00 2QFY02-1QFY06
Umatilla, OR 3QFY97 3QFY00 2QFY02-3QFY05
Pine Bluff, AR 4QFY98 3QFY01 2QFY03-3QFY06
Pueblo, CO** On Hold On Hand
Blue Grass, KY** On Hold
Aberdeen, MD*** 1QFY99 3QFY02 2QFY04-1QFY05
Newport, IN*** 1QFY99 4QFY02 3QFY04-1QFY05

Full-scale operations began 2QFY94.

**Schedule on-hold as directed by Public Law 104-208 pending technology evaluation by Program Manager for Assembled Chemical Weapon Assessment.

***Schedule represents employment of neutrlization-based technology. Start of construction milestones represents the “start of design/build” effort.

















TABLE 50


[Current year dollars in millions]
Location Facilities Operations Total
Johnston Atoll1,4351,435
Tooele, UT4471,2321,679
Anniston, AL4089901,398
Umatilla, OR4489021,350
Pine Bluff, AR3478441,191
Pueblo, CO4519011,352
Blue Grass, KY*4338141,247
Aberdeen, MD*185517702
Newport, IN192504696
CAMDS, UT465465
PMCD Training Facility, MD35102137

*Costs for these facilities may change as a result of evaluations/assessment from the Program Manager for Assembled Chemical Weapon Assessment (as directed Public Law 104-208).

















TABLE 51


OBLIGATION PLAN (THRU END OF CONSTRUCTION)
[Current year dollars in millions]
Location FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 Total
Pine Bluff38.11.326.172.017.00.0154.5
Newport0.00.027.560.887.513.8189.6
Aberdeen0.00.026.558.585.014.5184.5
Umatilla76.057.451.09.00.00.0193.4

*Data does not include any costs associated with the depot support projects.

















TABLE 52


Project Construction Systemization Operations
Pine Bluff4QFY983QFY012QFY03-3QFY06
Newport*2QFY994QFYY023QFY04-1QFY05
Aberdeen*1QFY993QFY022QFY04-1QFY05
Umatilla3QFY973QFY002QFY02-3QFY05

*Schedule represents employment of neutralization-based technology. Start of construction milestone represents the “start of design/build” effort.

















TABLE 53


Requested
($ millions)
Appropriated
($ million)
Fiscal year:
199844.886.1
199733.75105.35
199614.248.856
199549.7649.76
199467.5377.0
1993143.6692.6
199274.9874.98
199144.140.1
199036.32940.0
198972.372.3




















TABLE 54


BEQ (Recruit In-processing) $14,40
BEQ (“A” School) 24,80
BEQ (RTC Staff) 17,40
Replace Small Arms Range 5,40
Drill Hall Replacement 10,20
Extend Recruit Support Ctr 1,70
Replace RTC Drill Hall 10,30
Pass Security Office 1,19
All Weather Track 1,56
Air Conditioning Upgrade 6,60